Search for: "Little v. Pfizer Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 12:54 pm
Under Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
(Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:27 pm
Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:54 am
In Boyer v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
The Federal Court recently held, in Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 825 F. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
The soon-to-be-released independent film Little Pink House dramatizes the story behind Kelo v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 490 F. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
(Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:54 pm
Pfizer Inc., 2009 WL 3230611, at *8 (W.D. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:08 pm
A dozen companies that sold the drugs are named in the Arkansas suits, including Pfizer Inc. and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., Barr Laboratories Inc. and Mead Johnson & Co., among others. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:23 am
Pfizer, Inc., Docket Nos. 05-4863-cv (L), 05-6768-cv (CON), slip op. (2d Cir. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:11 am
See, e.g., Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
Pfizer, Inc., 381 F. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:37 pm
Kelo's relocated Little Pink House. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
It has been a little over two years since the Supreme Court issued its decision in Bauman v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:06 am
Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:36 am
Unfortunately, we don’t have great empirical studies to quantify the effects of moving a drug from a preferred tier (with little-to-no co-payment from patients) to a less-preferred tier (with a much more significant out-of-pocket obligation for the patient). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:14 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 361 F.3d 1016, 1020 (7th Cir.2004). [read post]
